Legal Opinion

State v. Garrett

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 10, 1890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Louisa District Court., — Hon. J. K. Johnson, Judge. Appellants were convicted of the crime of resisting an officer. From a judgment imposing a fine of one hundred- dollars on each they appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

— The indictment charges that Aner Nearhood, as marshal of the town of Wapello, arrested, and was conveying to jail in a proper manner, an intoxicated person, and that, while so engaged, the defendants; George Garrett, Matt McMahill and Willard Hicldin, wilfully and maliciously assaulted him. The jury found all the defendants guilty as charged. A motion for a new trial was sustained as to Hicklin, and overruled as to the others. Garrett and McMahill appeal.

*5901. Resisting officer: indictment. I.Appellants object to the indictment, for the reason that it did not give the name of the person under…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Montgomery v. SuttonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gale H. Johnson v. John E. Bennett, Warden, Iowa State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  2. Woods v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  3. Gale H. Johnson v. John E. Bennett, Warden, Iowa State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API