Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. Sutton

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 13, 1882PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Boone District Court. This is an action for malicious prosecution and for false imprisonment. There was a trial to a jury, and verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Rothrock J.

1. MALICIOUS prosecution: resisting officer: evidence: not dismissible. I. The defendant was marshal of the city of Boone, and on the day of the general election in October, 1879, certain parties engaged in an angry discus-r ° ° , . ° J sion m one of the streets of the city, which at-footed a large crowd of persons. The defendant appeared upon the scene and took hold of one Parker, who was one of the angry disputants, and ordered him to desist from making a disturbance. Parker went away. John Hart was engaged in the dispute with Parker, and on the other side of the controversy. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Heath v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860
  2. State v. BatesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Davis v. SeeleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  2. Bennett v. HollowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  3. Heath v. HaganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  4. Montgomery v. SuttonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  5. State v. GarrettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API