Legal Opinion

People v. Dickinson

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 15, 2011No. 235PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the indictment dismissed.

It is undisputed that the People were not ready for trial within six months of the commencement of the action, as CPL 30.30 (1) (a) requires, even after application of the exclusions listed in CPL 30.30 (4). The People’s only claim is that defendant waived his rights under CPL 30.30 by participating in plea negotiations for several months.

While a defendant may waive rights under CPL 30.30 (People v Waldron, 6 NY3d 463 [2006]), the record here contains no evidence of any waiver,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. WaldronNew York Court of Appeals · 2006

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. The People v. Mark JurginsNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. People v. MacalusoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  4. People v. LewinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  5. People v. DixonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API