Tangney v. Sullivan
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
This is an action for malicious prosecution. It comes before us by exception to the refusal of a ruling that, upon all the evidence, the plaintiff could not maintain his action. But *167as the bill of exceptions only purports to set forth all the evidence showing that the defendant acted in or controlled the prosecution, not all the evidence in the case, our consideration must be confined to that point. Whether, as the defendant argues, the plaintiff failed to make out a want of probable cause, is not before us. Also the ruling asked dealt with the evidence, not with the pleadings. See McLean v.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- West v. PlattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
- Woodworth v. MillsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- McLean v. RichardsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
- Gibbs v. AmesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
3Cited by13 opinions
- Correllas v. ViveirosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Limone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Zenik v. O'BRIENSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Limone v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
- Grimes v. GreenblattSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.