Legal Opinion

Redman v. Purrington

California Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1884No. 7,827PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sonoma County, and from an order refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

—Four several promissory notes, together with a mortgage to secure their payment, were executed by T. F. Purrington to one Sutton. One of the notes was for $1,500, payable three months after date, another was for $1,000, payable one year after date, another was for $1,000, payable two years after date, and the fourth was for $3,000, payable three years after date. The $1,500 note was paid. The $3,000 note was sold and assigned by Sutton to plaintiff for value—he (Sutton) retaining the $1,000 notes. In the absence of any special agreement to the contrary, the assignment, under such…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Grattan v. WigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robertson v. MelvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  2. Bartlett Estate Co. v. Fairhaven Land Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Perkins v. Chad Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API