Legal Opinion
Hartley Ex Rel. Hartley v. Parnell
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided October 28, 1999No. 98-6829PublishedCited by 414 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARNES, Circuit Judge:
Defendant Tillman Parnell brings this interlocutory appeal from the district court’s denial of his motion for summary judgment on the plaintiffs’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Title IX claims against him in his individual and official capacities. Because we conclude that Parnell was entitled to qualified immunity on the claims against him in his individual capacity, we reverse the district court’s denial of summary judgment with respect to those claims. We also conclude that we lack jurisdiction over Parnell’s appeal of the denial of summary judgment on the official capacity…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Siegert v. GilleySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Wilson v. LayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by414 opinions
- Shotz v. City of Plantation, FLCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Fitzgerald v. Barnstable School CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Cottone v. JenneCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Keith Ex Rel. Estate of Cook v. DeKalb CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Cottone v. JenneCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
409 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.