Legal Opinion

Wierich v. De Zoya

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1845PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Bill in Chancery for an injunction, &c., in the Jo Daviess Circuit Court, filed by the appellant against the appellees. At the August special term of said Court, 1845, the Hon. Thomas C. Browne presiding, the hill was demurred to, the demurrer sustained and the bill dismissed.

1Opinion of the Court

The Opinion of the Court was delivered by

Caton, J.*

The bill shows, that the complainant was served with a garnishee process in an attachment suit, in which the present defendants were plaintiffs and one McCormick was defendant, in which a judgment was perfected against the present complainant as a debtor of McCormick, to whom in fact he was not indebted, and that he might have successfully defended himself against the said proceedings, had he attended and made defence. The reason assigned in the bill for not attending to the suit is, that after the issuing of the set. fa., which was sued out…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Flood v. TempletonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. McEvoy v. Quaker City Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Tamimi v. TamimiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  5. United States v. KuscheDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API