Baldwin v. Napa & Sonoma Wine Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco granting a new trial. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtCooper, J.
This action was brought by plaintiff to recover damages for breach of a contract for sale of wines by plaintiff to defendant. The ease was tried with a jury, and a verdict returned for plaintiff in the sum of $3,997.17, upon which judgment was entered. Defendant made a motion-for a new trial upon the grounds of insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict; that the verdict is against law,, and errors of law occurring at the trial and excepted to by the defendant. The court granted the motion in genera'.' terms.
All presumptions are in favor of the order made by ihetrial court, and an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kauffman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Estate of MotzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Churchill v. FlournoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Keith v. Electrical Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
- Bledsoe v. DecrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by3 opinions
- Baar v. TigermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Central Trust Co. v. StoddardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Wright v. Yosemite Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915