Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
State Ex Rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. Holscher
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided May 15, 1975No. 39054Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partClinton, J.
I concur with the portion of the opinion which finds the respondent not guilty of violations of DR 7-102 (A) (3) and DR 8-101 (A) (2). I dissent from that portion of the opinion which finds the respondent guilty of a violation of DR 7-102 (A) (5). I further disagree with some of the wholly unnecessary dicta in the majority opinion.
I agree that the respondent was negligent in not determining the content of section 77-1918, R. R. S. 1943 (Reissue 1971), Laws 1971, L.B. 743, previous to filing the various claims for services rendered. Negligence, however, is not the charge made against him and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Felton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Standard Oil Company of Texas and Pasotex Pipe Line Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- People v. DanielsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Bank v. EganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- United States v. MartinezDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.