Legal Opinion

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Kelley

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 8, 1898PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Lee District Court. — Hon. A. J. McCrary, Judge. Action to quiet the title of lot 1, in block 8, in the city of Keokuk. De'cree us prayed', and -defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

*1081 *107— The title to lot 1, in block 8, in the city of Keokuk, was in the heirs of one Hine, in 1869, who conveyed the same to the plaintiff in 1882. Their title, *108however, had been divested by a tax deed executed to George B. Dennison, November 4, 1874, and later by a tax deed executed to W. B. Collins, April 21, 1881. Collins conveyed the land to the plaintiff in 1882. Unless the title so acquired by the plaintiff has been lost by the tax deeds under which the defendant Kelley claims, it is entitled to the relief sought. We may then .give our attention to these deeds. The land in controversy was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Barney v. KeokukSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Haight v. City of KeokukSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856
  3. Bradley v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  4. Shelley v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  5. Bowers v. HallockSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Small v. HullMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Smith v. HuberSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
  3. Swan v. HarveySupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  4. Grimes v. EllysonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  5. Biberdorf v. JuhnkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API