Legal Opinion

Fulbright v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided March 31, 2022No. 3:20-cv-02392Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JOE M. FULBRIGHT, § PLAINTIFF, § § V. § CIVIL CASE NO. 3:20-CV-2392-BK § UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO., § DEFENDANT. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pursuant to the parties’ consent to proceed before the undersigned United States magistrate judge, Doc. 17, the Court now considers Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Doc. 88, and Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Doc. 94. For the reasons that follow, Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED IN PART and Defendant’s motion is…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Forsyth v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API