Legal Opinion

Vanasse v. Cavey

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1932No. 23241. En BancPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

This is an equitable action instituted for the purpose of obtaining a decree reforming a note for $5,500, executed hy plaintiffs in favor of defendant Charles Cavey, plaintiffs also asking for reformation of a real estate mortgage, executed by them in Mr. Cavey’s favor, securing payment of the note above referred to.

In their complaint, plaintiffs alleged that the note and mortgage were executed by them as part of the purchase price of real estate purchased from defendants, the mortgage being junior to a mortgage in the sum of $35,000, payable to Puget Sound Savings & Loan Association.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Co. v. Jahn & BressiWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Erickson v. PooleWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Heffron v. FogelWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. J. G. Robinson Lettuce Farms v. SymonsWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Clutter v. StrangeWashington Supreme Court · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Akers v. SinclairWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Maxwell v. MaxwellWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. AgnewWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Marks v. Mike Scaler's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API