Legal Opinion
United States v. Stacey Sellner
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 15, 2014No. 13-3794PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.
Federal prisoner Stacey Sellner filed a pro se motion to vacate her conviction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, alleging that her attorney had failed to file a notice of appeal as requested. Before the district court ruled on that motion, Sellner filed another § 2255 motion raising a different claim. The district court dismissed Sellner’s first § 2255 motion on the merits without an evidentiary hearing and dismissed her second motion as “second or successive.” We reverse and remand.
I
Sellner pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Castro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Tony Goodrum v. Timothy BusbyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. TrentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Teresa Witthar v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- Patricio Guzman-Ortiz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Charmar BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.