Teresa Witthar v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Per curiam
Teresa Witthar petitioned for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, arguing that she was denied effective assistance of counsel when her attorney failed to file a requested notice of appeal. The district court denied Witthar’s petition on the merits without an evidentiary hearing. We reverse and remand.
Witthar pleaded guilty to conspiracy against rights, obstruction of justice, and interference with fair housing rights. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 1512(b)(1); 42 U.S.C. § 3631. In her plea agreement, Witthar waived her right to appeal or collaterally attack a finding of guilt. She further waived her right…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. PoindexterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- Anjulo-Lopez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Rojas-Medina v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- Dilang Dat v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- Chad Dressen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
- Rojas-Medina v. United StatesUnited States District Court · 2018
- Barris v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.