Bean v. Department of Health & Mental Hygiene
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtHarrell, J.
The issue presented in this case is whether, in a release eligibility proceeding under Maryland Code, Criminal Proce dure Article, §§ 3-114 and 3-119 (2006), a person committed to the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, pursuant to a finding of not criminally responsible, is required as a matter of law to produce expert medical testimony in order to meet his or her evidentiary burden of proving he or she would not be a danger due to a mental disorder or mental retardation if released. The Circuit Court for Baltimore City determined, in granting conditional release to Linwood Bean, that…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jurek v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Scarlett Harbor Associates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Scarlett Harbor Associates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Schultz v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Steamfitters Local v. Erie InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- Eastern Shore Title Co. v. OchseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.