Legal Opinion

Bean v. Department of Health & Mental Hygiene

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 5, 2008No. 7, September Term, 2008PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarrell, J.

The issue presented in this case is whether, in a release eligibility proceeding under Maryland Code, Criminal Proce dure Article, §§ 3-114 and 3-119 (2006), a person committed to the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, pursuant to a finding of not criminally responsible, is required as a matter of law to produce expert medical testimony in order to meet his or her evidentiary burden of proving he or she would not be a danger due to a mental disorder or mental retardation if released. The Circuit Court for Baltimore City determined, in granting conditional release to Linwood Bean, that…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Jurek v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Scarlett Harbor Associates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  5. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Scarlett Harbor Associates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  2. Schultz v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. Steamfitters Local v. Erie InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  4. Eastern Shore Title Co. v. OchseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API