Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Sherman

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1901PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Writ of Error to the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. E. B. Gower, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cartwright

The „ county court of Cook county entered a judgment confirming a special assessment against the property of defendants in error to pay the cost of paving Hamlin .avenue from West Chicago avenue to North avenue, in the city of Chicago. Upon a writ of error from this court we reversed the judgment so far as it concerned said property, and remanded the cause to the county court for such other and further proceedings as to law and justice should appertain. Lingle v. City of Chicago, 178 Ill. 628.

The ordinance provided that the roadway of Hamlin avenue between said points should be curbed with a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Holden v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Kuester v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  3. City of Paxton v. BogardusIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Lingle v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Chicago v. HoldenIllinois Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API