Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Holden

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1902PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Writ of Error to the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. Been B. Gower, Judge, presiding.

1Per curiam

This is a special assessment proceeding to defray the cost of paving, curbing and guttering Warren avenue from Homan street to a point within ninety-eight feet of the east line of Fall street, in the city of Chicago. A judgment confirming the assessment was reversed in this court (Holden v. City of Chicago, 172 Ill. 263,) for the reason the ordinance did not prescribe the height of the curb. The cause was remanded, and this is a writ of error prosecuted to reverse the decision adverse to the city rendered upon a rehearing of the cause. The record and the matters assigned therein as for error…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Holden v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. City of Chicago v. ShermanIllinois Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Goodrich v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API