Legal Opinion
National Ass'n of State Utility Consumer Advocates v. Federal Communications Commission
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided July 31, 2006No. Nos. 05-11682, 05-12601PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRYOR, Circuit Judge:
The key issue presented in this petition for review is whether the Federal Communications Commission exceeded its authority, under section 332(c)(3)(A) of the Communications Act of 1934, when it issued an order that preempted the states from requiring or prohibiting the use of line items in customer billing for cellular wireless services. 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(3)(A); see Truth-in-Billing and Billing Format, Nat’l Ass’n of State Util. Consumer Advocates’ Petition for Declaratory Ruling Regarding Truth-in-Billing, 20 F.C.C.R. 6448 (2005) [hereinafter “Second Report and Order”…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Uri Marrache v. Bacardi U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- Peck v. Cingular Wireless, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. FarrisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Schnall v. AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 2011
- WWC Holding Co., Inc. v. SopkinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.