Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. Brim

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 17, 1936No. 4-4161PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, C. J.

This action was instituted by appellee, Monk Brim, as father and next friend of his son, Elect Brim, against appellants, L. W. Baldwin and Guy A. Thompson, trustees for the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, in the Clark Circuit Court to compensate a personal injury received by the son on September 21, 1934, at Benton, Arkansas, by and through the negligent operation of a train. The complaint in effect alleged that, while Elect Brim lay asleep near' appellants railroad track at a place in full view of the operators of their train, had a lookout been kept as required by § 6568 of Crawford &…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Blytheville, Leachville & Arkansas Southern Railway Co. v. GessellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  2. Eckert v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  3. Bush v. BrewerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  4. Kelly v. DeQueen & Eastern RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  5. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. McClintonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lovett v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  2. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  3. Thrower Ex Rel. Lockhart v. HenwoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  4. Missouri Pac. R. v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
  5. Pye v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API