Legal Opinion
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Sears Plc
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided July 24, 1990No. Civ. A. 88-342-JLLPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LATCHUM, Senior District Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
Sears, Roebuck and Company (“Roebuck”) filed a trademark and trade name infringement suit on June 28, 1988, against Sears pic (“PLC”). See Docket Item (“D.I.”) 1. On March 10, 1989, Roebuck amended its complaint to add Sears Financial Services Limited (“SFSL”) as a defendant. Discovery closed on December 15, 1989. Currently before the Court are SFSL’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, D.I. 206, and for summary judgment. D.I. 224. 1 Because the Court finds that it lacks personal jurisdiction over SFSL, this…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Applied Biosystems, Inc. v. Cruachem, Ltd.District Court, D. Delaware · 1991
- Heroes, Inc. v. Heroes FoundationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Advanced Environmental Recycling Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1993
- Intel Corp. v. Silicon Storage Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1998
- Thorn EMI North America, Inc. v. Micron Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.