Legal Opinion
United States v. Proctor
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided December 20, 1922No. 318PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, District Judge.
This cause has been submitted upon a stipulation as follows:
“It is agreed by the United States of America, plaintiff, acting by and through its Attorney, D. E. Simmons, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Texas, and defendant, F. C. Proctor, by his attorney, John E. Green, Jr., as follows:
“I. That the appended statement represents the correct amounts due the tax from F. C. Proctor and Mrs. Lucy W. Proctor, to wit: From F. C. Proctor, $290.67; from Duey W. Proctor, $290.67; total, $581.34, less a credit of .$75.25, leaving a balance of $506.09 due.
“II.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Billings v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- State v. Mutual Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
- City of Rochester v. . BlossNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Sargent & Co. v. TuttleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
3Cited by8 opinions
- MacAtee, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- Bourdeaux v. Gilbert Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- United States v. ReganDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- In Re W. J. Marshall Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1924
- In re BrezinDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.