Legal Opinion

Nadeau v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 19, 1930No. 28,090PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 233 N.W. 808. Plaintiff recovered a verdict in a suit under the federal employers liability act, and this is an appeal from an order denying defendant's alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.

Plaintiff was a section hand in defendant's employ in November, 1927. On the 19th of that month he and Voss, his foreman, were engaged in piling tamarack ties near the stockyards at Tenney, a station on defendant's line in this state. At this point the defendant's track runs east and west, and the ties were being piled on the north side at a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Berwind Fuel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Salus v. Great Northern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Nadeau v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Klingbeil v. TruesdellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API