Legal Opinion

Nadeau v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 19, 1930No. 28,090PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.

Plaintiff recovered a verdict in a suit under the federal employers liability act, and this is an appeal from an order denying defendant’s alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.

*112Plaintiff was a section hand in defendant’s employ in November, 1927. On the 19th of that month he and Voss, his foreman, were engaged in piling tamarack ties near the stockyards at Tenney, a station on defendant’s line in this state. At this point the defendant’s track runs east and west, and the ties were being piled on the north side at a convenient distance from the track.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Berwind Fuel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Salus v. Great Northern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nadeau v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API