Nadeau v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.
Plaintiff recovered a verdict in a suit under the federal employers liability act, and this is an appeal from an order denying defendant’s alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.
*112Plaintiff was a section hand in defendant’s employ in November, 1927. On the 19th of that month he and Voss, his foreman, were engaged in piling tamarack ties near the stockyards at Tenney, a station on defendant’s line in this state. At this point the defendant’s track runs east and west, and the ties were being piled on the north side at a convenient distance from the track.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Johnson v. Berwind Fuel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Salus v. Great Northern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by1 opinion
- Nadeau v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930