Legal Opinion

Estate of McCoy

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 27, 1942No. Civ. 3013PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.

This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s petition for a family allowance. The admitted facts are as follows:

Appellant and Thomas E. McCoy, now deceased, were husband and wife. They had no children. Appellant had procured an interlocutory decree of divorce under a complaint charging him with extreme cruelty. Prior to the rendition of said decree appellant and deceased executed a property settlement agreement the terms of which, so far as material here, are as follows:

“The settlement of community property rights effected by this instrument shall continue to be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Estate of YoellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Landers v. WhitneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Estate of GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Bidigare v. First National Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Slotnikow v. ShaperoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Estate of BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Schwartz v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Brisacher v. BrisacherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Biernat v. AlbaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API