Legal Opinion

Kimbrell v. Paige

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 22, 1982No. 81-764PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LETTS, Chief Judge.

This appeal considers whether an injured employee, who has received workmen’s compensation, can sue a third party tort-feasor for the first time after the passage of three years, although the compensation carrier has, in the second year following the accident, given the thirty day notice of its intention to seek subrogation and has filed an appropriate suit in that same second year. We hold the employee does not have a separate cause of action against the tort-feasor.

A detailing of all the facts would add little to this opinion and we thus restrict ourselves to those…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rosenthal v. ScottSupreme Court of Florida · 1963
  2. Zurich Insurance Company v. RentonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  3. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. BortzSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
  4. Maryland Casualty Co. v. SimmonsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  5. Jersey Insurance Co. of New York v. CuttrissDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kimbrell v. PaigeSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. Frymer v. BrettschneiderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API