Legal Opinion

Kimbrell v. Paige

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 5, 1984No. 63171PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

448 So.2d 1009 (1984)

Dorman K. KIMBRELL, Jr., and Earlene M. Kimbrell, His Wife, Petitioners,

v.

Phillip PAIGE, et al., Respondents.

No. 63171.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 5, 1984.

Schuler & Wilkerson, P.A., and Edna L. Caruso, West Palm Beach, for petitioners.

Samuel Tyler Hill of Hill & Neale, Fort Lauderdale, Frank W. Weathers of Weathers & Seaman, Lantana, for respondents.

ADKINS, Justice.

This cause is before us on a question certified to the Court by the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Kimbrell v. Paige, 422 So.2d 902, 905 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), as one of great public importance. The…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gates v. FoleySupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. Wade v. ClowerSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  3. Zirin v. Charles Pfizer & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1961
  4. Pumo v. PumoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. Knabb v. DunerSupreme Court of Florida · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Engle v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2006
  2. State v. McBrideSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  3. Florida Dept. of Transp. v. JulianoSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  4. Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. DouglasSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
  5. Tyson v. Viacom, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API