Legal Opinion
Tenisha R. Wilson, et al. v. City of South Euclid
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided November 25, 2025No. 1:22-cv-01861Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION TENISHA R. WILSON, et al., ) CASE NO. 1:22-cv-01861 ) Plaintiffs, ) JUDGE CHARLES E. FLEMING ) v. ) ) CITY OF SOUTH EUCLID, ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND Defendant. ) ORDER Before the Court is Tenisha Wilson and Derman Gordon’s (“Plaintiffs”) Motion for Summary Judgment against the City of South Euclid (“City”). (ECF No. 29, PageID #477). The City timely opposed Plaintiffs’ motion. (ECF No. 31, PageID #673). Plaintiffs filed a reply brief in support of their motion. (ECF No. 36, PageID #1066). For the reasons stated below,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Edward E. ERCEGOVICH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.