Adamson v. Birmingham, City of, The
District Court, N.D. Alabama
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION GINO ADAMSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No.: 2:21-cv-902-AMM ) THE CITY OF BIRMINGHAM, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION This case comes before the court on a motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant the City of Birmingham (“the City”). Doc. 25. For the reasons explained below, the motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND Facts set forth in the parties’ statement of undisputed facts are deemed admitted for summary judgment purposes unless controverted by the response or reply of the opposing party. Doc. 12 at 19.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.