Legal Opinion

Mattieligh v. Poe

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1960No. 35013Published

1Opinion of the Court

57 Wn.2d 203 (1960)

356 P.2d 328

OTTILIO MATTIELIGH, Appellant,

v.

DWIGHT POE, Respondent,

LEONARD DEMONBRUN et al., Defendants.[1]

No. 35013.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

October 27, 1960.

Miracle, Treadwell & Pruzan and Jerome Shulkin, for appellant.

FOSTER, J.

Plaintiff below appeals from a judgment of dismissal. Appellant sued to recover a real-estate broker's commission paid to respondent Poe. At the conclusion of appellant's evidence, the court orally granted respondent's motion to dismiss "on the ground that the evidence produced by the plaintiff was not sufficient to sustain his…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Mattieligh v. PoeWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. O'BRIEN v. SchultzWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Smith v. Fidelity & Columbia Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  5. Latson v. EatonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API