Jonathan Grott, Sr. v. State of Indiana

BAKER, Judge.

[1] Jonathan Grott appeals his conviction for Auto Theft, 1 a class D felony, claiming that the evidence is insufficient to sustain his conviction. Finding that the evidence is sufficient, we affirm.

Facts

[2] On February 11, 2013, Grott rented a vehicle from Enterprise Rent-A-Car (Enterprise) in Valparaiso. Grott signed a written contract, which provided that the vehicle was to be returned on February 13, 2013. At some point, Grott upgraded his rental vehicle to a Cadillac. Grott continued to rent the Cadillac until April 5, 2013. Although no new contract was written, Enterprise…