Legal Opinion

Seneca Nation of Indians v. Jimeson

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1909PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion to vacate an injunction,

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

By the affidavits read on this motion it appears that in November, 1908, at the biennial election held on the Cattaraugus reservation, one Frank L. Patterson was elected president of the Seneca Nation of Indians, having received a majority of some sixty-four votes.

The defendant in this action was the defeated opposing candidate and, in his answer to the complaint, contends the election was illegal and void by reason of alleged bribery of inters and other irregularities.

The affidavits disclose, however, that Patterson entered upon the discharge of his duties as president, and is actually…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Ward v. DrakeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  2. Jackson ex dem. Van Dyke v. ReynoldsNew York Supreme Court · 1817
  3. Seneca Nation of Indians v. JohnNew York Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jewell v. MohrNew York Supreme Court · 1912
  2. In re DarchNew York Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Seneca Nation of Indians v. JimesonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API