Legal Opinion

In re Darch

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1933PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Charles B. Wheeler,

Official Referee. The first of the above-entitled proceedings is to declare and enforce an alleged attorney’s lien on certain funds now held by William J. Darch and by William H. Coon, the proceeds of certain royalties paid them for mining gypsum underlying lands of the Tonawanda Nation of Indians under circumstances stated later in this opinion.

The second proceeding is to compel the payment to the petitioner Harrison of said moneys so held by Darch and Coon. Motions were made at the Special Term of this court for the relief demanded in the respective petitions. As the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. KagamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. United States v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Matter of HeinsheimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. People Ex Rel. Cusick v. . DalyNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Loomis v. . Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. National Gypsum Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API