Legal Opinion
United States v. Tyree Washington
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 10, 2013No. 12-1219PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOOD, Senior District Judge.
Defendant-Appellant Tyree Washington argues that the district court erred by: (1) denying his motion to suppress impermis-sibly suggestive identification evidence; (2) denying his motion for judgment of acquittal on the basis that the prosecution presented insufficient evidence to convict him on counts four and seven of the indictment; and (3) by imposing his three sentences under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) in the order in which they were committed, thereby increasing his mandatory minimum sentence from fifty-seven years to sixty years. The government concedes that…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Deal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Holloway v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. Rejon TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Frank RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Rodney Mack, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Manuel SotoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. PierceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.