Legal Opinion
Eiland v. Fohs
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided December 4, 2020No. 2:20-cv-02011Unknown
1Opinion
2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 *** TYRRELL JONES EILAND, 8 Case No. 2:20-cv-02011-JCM-VCF Plaintiff, 9 vs. 10 ORDER JASON R. FOHS, et al., 11 Defendants. APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA 12 P NA OU . 1P -E 1R ) IS (EFC NO. 1); COMPLAINT (ECF 13 Before the Court are pro se plaintiff Tyrrell Jones Eiland’s application to proceed in forma 14 pauperis (ECF No. 1) and complaint (ECF No. 1-1). Jones Eiland’s (1) in forma pauperis application is 15 granted; (2) his complaint is dismissed without prejudice with leave to amend. 16 DISCUSSION 17 Jones Eiland’s filings…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.