Legal Opinion
State v. Linares
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 13, 1999No. 42412-2-I; 42439-4-IPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Agid, A.C.J.
Carlos Linares and Carlos Vivas Nieves (Vivas) appeal their convictions for two counts of first degree robbery, arguing they were based on insufficient evidence. They also contend that the trial court erred by admitting evidence of an earlier, highly similar robbery as common plan evidence under ER 404(b) and imposing a 60-month firearm enhancement. In a pro se brief, Vivas contends that the trial court abused its discretion by admitting evidence of an unreliable photo montage identification. We affirm.
FACTS
On October 18, 1996, Gregory Winokur, a jewelry store district manager,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. VaughnWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. EacretCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. VickersWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. VickersWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. KinardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- State v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- State v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.