Legal Opinion

State v. Barker

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 26, 2000No. 18773-0-IIIPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

This is a robbery case. “A person commits robbery when he unlawfully takes personal property from the person of another or in his presence against his will by the use or threatened use of immediate force, violence, or fear of injury . . . .” RCW 9A.56.190. “A person is guilty of robbery in the second degree if he commits robbery.” RCW 9A.56.210(1). “A person is guilty of robbery in the first degree if in the commission of a robbery... he . . . [displays what appears to be a firearm or other deadly weapon!.]” RCW 9A.56.200(1)(b). Anton Barker walked into the Yakima Payless Shoe Store and told…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. WorkmanWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. BourgeoisWashington Supreme Court · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Anton E. Barker v. Gary FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. State v. CurtisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  3. State v. CurtisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  4. State v. KinardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. State v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API