Legal Opinion
Malec Holdings II v. English, Christopher
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 24, 2007No. 06-1906UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
After the district court dismissed Malee Holdings II Limited’s suit against Christopher and Anita English, their attorney Robert Mihelich, and a process server, Ira Robins, the defendants sought Rule 11 sanctions. The district court denied the defendants’ motion for sanctions. Because the district court did not address several viable arguments in favor of an award of Rule 11 sanctions, we VACATE and REMAND.
I
In May 2004, attorney Robert Mihelich, representing Christopher and Anita English and C.S. English Golf, LLC, filed a breach of contract action in state court against their former…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Annare L. Loubser v. Robert W. ThackerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Native American Arts, Inc. v. Peter Stone Co., U.S.A.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Janik v. Grande Prairie Care and Rehab Center LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2025