Legal Opinion
Fioretti v. Aztar Indiana Gaming Co., LLC
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided June 26, 2003No. 82A04-0211-CV-556PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Judge.
Appellant-plaintiff Joseph A. Fioretti appeals the entry of summary judgment for appellees-defendants Aztar Indiana Gaming Company (Aztar). Specifically, Fioret-ti claims that a genuine issue of material fact remains as to whether Trooper McCarthy was an employee or agent of Aztar when he caused Fioretti pain and injury during an arrest. Concluding that the trial court did not err in entering summary judgment for Aztar, we affirm.
FACTS
The facts most favorable to Fioretti, the nonmoving party, reveal that Aztar operates a riverboat casino in Evansville. Pursuant to statutes…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- GKN Co. v. MagnessIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Moberly v. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Creel v. I.C.E. & Associates, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Hope Lutheran Church v. ChellewIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Woodworth v. Estate of YunkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
3Cited by3 opinions
- Miles Distributors, Inc. v. Specialty Construction Brands, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2006
- Farr v. Laidig Concrete, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Fioretti v. Aztar Indiana Gaming Co., LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003