Legal Opinion

(PC) Bonsall v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 2, 2020No. 1:19-cv-00418Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY BONSALL, Case No. 1:19-cv-00418-DAD-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER FOLLOWING INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 13 v. (ECF No. 34) 14 DR. KONGARA, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Anthony Bonsall (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 21, 2020, the 19 Court held an Initial Scheduling Conference (“Conference”). Plaintiff telephonically appeared 20 on his own behalf. Counsel Kandice Jung and Deborah Wadleigh…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ernest S. Little v. City of Seattle John Doe Jane Doe, and David PaulCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. GraceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Arizona v. United States District Court for District of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API