Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Goldstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 22, 1993PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 10, 1992, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

There is substantial evidence in the record to support the conclusion by the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant quit his employment as a tax accountant voluntarily and without good cause (see, Matter of Steed [Roberts], 115 AD2d 166; Matter of Artz [Levine] 50 AD2d 958). On his *920last day of work, claimant submitted a written…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of MullerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  2. In re the Claim of SteedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. In re the Claim of WoodsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. In re the Claim of ArtzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Claim of LarkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API