Legal Opinion

Thomas Ferwerda and United States of America v. Charles A. Coakwell, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 19, 1955No. 12245_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal from the dismissal by the district court of a complaint involving the issuance of a patent came on to be heard and has been considered upon the record and upon the oral arguments and briefs of the attorneys for the contending parties;

And it appearing from the two opinions filed by District Judge McNamee, 121 F.Supp. 334, that the action was filed two days too late under the applicable statute, section 146 of Public Law No. 593, 82nd Congress, 35 U.S.C.A. § 146, and that the rules, 35 U.S.C.A.Appendix, promulgated by the commissioner pursuant to such Act relied upon by ap pellants…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ferwerda v. CoakwellDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1953

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Evans v. Bainbridge Township TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Coakwell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
  3. Charles A. Coakwell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API