Legal Opinion

Charles A. Coakwell v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 4, 1961No. 213-57Published

1Opinion of the Court

WHITAKER, Judge.

Plaintiff sues for the infringement of his patent on an anti-blackout device (United States Letters Patent No.*2,676,-586). The patent was applied for on June 24, 1942, and was issued on April 27, 1954.

Defendant asserts that plaintiff’s patent was anticipated by the prior art and prior knowledge and is, therefore, invalid. This is defendant’s chief defense. It also says that plaintiff’s patent must, be limited to the particular embodiment of it as disclosed by the drawings and specifications and that, as so limited, its-device did not infringe it.

The apparatus on which plaintiff…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Radio Corp. of America v. Radio Engineering Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Ferwerda v. CoakwellDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1953
  4. Thomas Ferwerda and United States of America v. Charles A. Coakwell, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
  5. Coakwell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API