Eddy v. Aurora Iron Mining Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Gogebic. (Williams, J.) Negligence case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCahill, J.
The plaintiff sues to recover damages for, *549injuries sustained by him while working as a common miner in the defendant’s mine, September 11, 1888. The injury was caused by the falling of a “ set ” or platform upon which he was employed.
The Aurora is a hematite or soft ore mine, and the method adopted for carrying on its operations is what is known as the “ Nevada system,” and requires an elaborate system of timbering in the stope to permit the taking of ore.
The plaintiff’s case, as stated in his declaration, is substantially as follows: He was employed in stope No. 1, of shaft No. 5. The shaft…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Smith v. Peninsular Car WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by5 opinions
- West Pratt Coal Co. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
- Graham v. Newburg Orrel Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
- Neal v. Phoenix Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
- Cristanelli v. Saginaw Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
- 46 NW 17 CT LLC v. CITY OF MIAMIDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023