Legal Opinion

Eddy v. Aurora Iron Mining Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1890PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Gogebic. (Williams, J.) Negligence case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCahill, J.

The plaintiff sues to recover damages for, *549injuries sustained by him while working as a common miner in the defendant’s mine, September 11, 1888. The injury was caused by the falling of a “ set ” or platform upon which he was employed.

The Aurora is a hematite or soft ore mine, and the method adopted for carrying on its operations is what is known as the “ Nevada system,” and requires an elaborate system of timbering in the stope to permit the taking of ore.

The plaintiff’s case, as stated in his declaration, is substantially as follows: He was employed in stope No. 1, of shaft No. 5. The shaft…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. Peninsular Car WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. West Pratt Coal Co. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
  2. Graham v. Newburg Orrel Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Neal v. Phoenix Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Cristanelli v. Saginaw Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
  5. 46 NW 17 CT LLC v. CITY OF MIAMIDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API