Legal Opinion

United States v. Strohmeyer & Arpe Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 16, 1909No. 136 (4,957)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. The Circuit Court affirmed a decision of the Board of General Appraisers (G. A. 6,593, T.. D. 28,174), reversing the action of the collector. The following is the opinion of Platt, District Judge, in the court below: The merchandise in question consists of cauliflower, trimmed, washed, and packed in a weak brine.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. The Circuit Court affirmed a decision of the Board of General Appraisers (G. A. 6,593, T.. D. 28,174), reversing the action of the collector. The following is the opinion of Platt, District Judge, in the court below: The merchandise in question consists of cauliflower, trimmed, washed, and packed in a weak brine. It was assessed for duty at 40 per cent, ad valorem under the provision in Act duly 24, 1897, e. 11, § .1, Schedule G, par. 241, 30 Stat. 170 (U. S’. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1649), for “all…

1Opinion of the Court

COXE, Circuit Judge.

The merchandise in controversy is cauliflower trimmed, washed, and packed in brine for preservation during transportation. The collector assessed duty at the rate of 40 per cent, ad valorem under Tariff Act July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 1, Schedule G, par. 241, 30 Stat. 170 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1649), which provides for “all vegetables, prepared or preserved.” The importer contends that it should have been classified under paragraph 257, 30 Stat. 171 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1650), which provides an ad valorem duty of 25 per cent, for “vegetables in their natural state.”

The…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Luisi Truck Lines, Inc. v. Washington Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  2. North Pacific Canners & Packers v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  3. United States v. De BoerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  4. General Freight Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
  5. United States v. Hothouse Products Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API