Legal Opinion

United States v. Hothouse Products Corp.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 6, 1933No. 3670Published

1Opinion of the Court

Uenroot, Judge,

delivered the .opinion of the court:

This is an appeal by the United States from a judgment of the United States Customs Court, sustaining three protests of appellees to the classification by the collector at the port of New York of certain shipments of endives from Belgium as “Vegetables in their natural state,” under paragraph 774 of the Tariff Act of 1930, the pertinent provisions of which read as follows:

Par. 774. Vegetables in their natural state, * * * not specially provided for, 50 per centum ad valorem.

Appellees claimed the merchandise to be dutiable under paragraph 775…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Strohmeyer & Arpe Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API