Legal Opinion

Roe v. Johnson

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 1, 2004No. 03 Civ. 8501(DLC)PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

COTE, District Judge.

Pro se plaintiff Jane Roe brings this action under a fictitious name against the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, First Department and several members of the First Department’s Committee on Character and Fitness (the “Committee”) in their official and individual capacities. Roe’s complaint, filed with this Court’s Pro Se Office on April 10, 2003, alleges that the Committee’s questioning of Roe concerning her mental health violated Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (the “ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12132, 1 and brings suit…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. McKnight v. MiddletonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
  2. Guttman v. KhalsaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  3. Bernstein v. New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  4. Degrafinreid v. RicksDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  5. JSC Foreign Economic Ass'n Technostroyexport v. International Development & Trade ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API