Legal Opinion
Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation v. Stults
Montana Supreme Court
Decided December 6, 2002No. 01-415PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trieweiler
¶1 The Petitioners, the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation, have petitioned this Court to exercise original jurisdiction and enjoin the issuance of a Beneficial Water Use permit to Reginald C. Lang. The Tribes further request that we find the Department of Natural Resources and Conservation (DNRC) and the individual Respondents, Jack Stults, Bud Clinch and Donald MacIntyre, in contempt of a prior order of this Cotut. We permanently vacate the Final Order issued in In the Matter of the Application for *423Beneficial Water Use Permit 76-L109371 by Reginald C. Lang…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Winters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Arizona v. San Carlos Apache Tribe of Ariz.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cappaert v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes v. ClinchMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- Flathead Joint Board of Control v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2017
- Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation v. StultsMontana Supreme Court · 2002
- Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes v. ClinchMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes v. ClinchMontana Supreme Court · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.