Legal Opinion

(PC) Melendez v. Diaz

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 2, 2024No. 1:20-cv-01393Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 FREDDY ANTHONY MENDOZA, et Case No. 1:20-cv-01393-KES-CDB al., 9 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO Plaintiffs, GRANT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR 10 SUMMARY JUDGMENT v. 11 (Doc. 89) RALPH DIAZ, et al., 12 14-DAY DEADLINE TO FILE Defendants. OBJECTIONS 13 14 15 Pending before the Court is the motion for summary judgement by Defendants Rosemary 16 Ndoh (“Ndoh” or “Warden Ndoh”) and Ralph Diaz (“Diaz” or “Secretary Diaz”). (Doc. 89). 17 Defendants contend the undisputed facts demonstrate that they are not liable for deliberate…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API