Legal Opinion
Farmer v. Kansas State University
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 18, 2019No. 17-3207; 17-3208PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
*1097 Congress, through Title IX, bans discrimination on the basis of sex in education programs receiving federal funding. Plaintiffs, two students at Kansas State University ("KSU"), allege that KSU, a recipient of federal educational funds, violated Title IX by being deliberately indifferent to reports it received of student-on-student sexual harassment which, in this case, involved rape. Often Title IX plaintiffs allege that a funding recipient's deliberate indifference to prior reports of rape caused the plaintiff subsequently to be raped or assaulted. But that is not the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Davis Ex Rel. LaShonda D. v. Monroe County Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Jackson v. Birmingham Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Sofie Karasek v. University of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Doe v. School District Number 1Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Jaycee Wamer v. Univ. of ToledoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- Sally Doe v. Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- Roe v. Cypress-Fairbanks IndepCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.