Legal Opinion

CR Bard v. Medical Components

District Court, D. Utah

Decided January 15, 2025No. 2:17-cv-00754Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION MEMORANDUM DECISION AND C.R. BARD, INC., et al., ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE Plaintiffs, (DOC. NO. 1088) v. Case No. 2:17-cv-00754 MEDICAL COMPONENTS, INC., District Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr. Defendant. Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg In this long-enduring patent infringement case, Plaintiffs (collectively, “Bard”) have filed a motion to strike a supplemental discovery response and portions of two expert reports served by Medical Components, Inc. (“MedComp”).1 Bard contends the expert reports and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Woodworker's Supply, Inc. v. Principal Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  2. Mentor Graphics Corporation v. Eve-Usa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
  3. Astrazeneca Ab v. Apotex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  4. Precision Fabrics Grp., Inc. v. Tietex Int'l, Ltd.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API